Iran and the oil trade

Oil market on edge as Hormuz risk premium builds

This content is marketing material

Key points:

  • Crude and gas markets trade nervously as we await an Iranian response to the US weekend attack on its nuclear facilities
  • Even without a full-scale disruption, the mere threat of interference in the Strait of Hormuz could delay shipments and trigger a sharper-than-expected short-term spike in prices.
  • An elevated geopolitical risk premium, currently close to USD 10 per barrel, cannot be sustained for long without a tangible supply disruption.
  • Expect continued volatility in crude oil markets, with Brent in a month's time potentially trading back below USD 70 or above USD 90, depending on which actions Iran chooses to take.


Crude oil prices have rebounded strongly this month, initially buoyed by seasonal summer demand tightening an otherwise well-supplied market. This helped offset bearish factors, such as rising OPEC+ output and macroeconomic uncertainties caused by Trump's trade war. What began as a steady recovery—partly fuelled by short covering—turned increasingly volatile in the past couple of weeks when Brent crude, the global crude benchmark, spiked after Israel launched a prolonged series of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and ballistic facilities.

This development reduced the chance of a negotiated solution between the US and Iran. Talks had centred almost exclusively on Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme, with the core objective of limiting its nuclear activities—particularly uranium enrichment—in exchange for relief from US-imposed economic sanctions. Hopes of a diplomatic resolution all but died at the weekend after US President Trump announced the initiation of "Operation Midnight Hammer," which included targeted attacks on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. He cautioned that additional targets are still under consideration, stressing that while the US does not seek regime change, it is prepared to conduct more extensive strikes if Iran does not pursue diplomatic engagement.

From an oil and natural gas market perspective, all eyes remain on the Strait of Hormuz—through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows—and whether Iran will seek to disrupt tanker traffic. While I have long held the view that strategic considerations—particularly toward Iran-friendly Qatar and its vital LNG exports—and Iran's dependence on China, its largest oil customer, would act as a restraining force, this remains true only as long as Iran's own oil export facilities are not targeted.

23olh_oil1
Source: Wikipedia.org

In addition, the main shipping canal through the Strait of Hormuz currently operates entirely within Omani territorial waters, as vessels actively avoid Iranian waters. Meanwhile, the Gulf Corporation Council (GCC), which includes Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman, has a mutual defence agreement that treats an attack on one member as an attack on all, though its implementation lacks NATO's automatic response mechanisms.

However, even without a full-scale disruption, the mere threat of interference in the strait could delay shipments and trigger a sharper-than-expected short-term spike in prices, before easing amid a potential release of strategic reserves, especially in the US and China, and a redirection of parts of Saudi and UAE crude oil exports via pipelines to facilities outside the strait.

Brent crude briefly traded above USD 80 per barrel when markets opened on Monday morning, only to suffer another setback, with sellers emerging ahead of key resistance around USD 82.50. Helping to explain why crude did not respond more forcefully to a disruption threat—which, if realised, could send prices towards USD 100 per barrel—is the fact that prices were already elevated ahead of the attack, with traders having positioned themselves for additional upside risks that were then unwound on Monday.

23olh_oil2
Brent crude oil, first month cont. - Source: Saxo

It is also worth noting that the current geopolitical risk premium—which, above USD 80, exceeds USD 10 per barrel—cannot be sustained for long without a tangible supply disruption. Absent that, price gains may struggle to hold, but the stage is nonetheless set for another volatile week across the energy complex.

Another important driver behind any given move in crude oil futures is the activity of speculators who seek to benefit from price movements in both directions. With the latest spike coming after a period of price weakness, it is no surprise that hedge funds held a negative bias on crude, which they were forced to reduce as prices started to rally, thereby adding further upside momentum via short covering.

In the latest update on speculators' behaviour in the futures market covering the week to 17 June—when Brent crude spiked higher by 14%—the ICE Europe Exchange published data showing a 40% jump in the net long position, with the bulk of the increase driven by short sellers reducing their short positions to a 13-month low. With short covering now all but done, additional buying will primarily have to come from fresh longs willing to pay a 10–15% premium relative to the fundamentally justified price—without disruptions—closer to USD 70 per barrel.

Note: The publication of data covering the US futures markets, including WTI, has been delayed from Friday to today following last week’s Juneteenth government holiday.

All developments point to continued volatility in the crude oil market, with the price of Brent in a month's time potentially trading back below USD 70 or above USD 90, depending on which actions Iran chooses to take.

23olh_oil3
Managed money positioning in Brent crude oil futures
Related articles/content             
20 June 2025: Commodities weekly Strength in energy and grains offsets pause in precious metals
19 June 2025: Wheat rise on short covering and weather woes but fundamentals still lacking
18 June 2025: Commodities strengthen into midyear as demand for hard assets heat up
16 June 2025: COT Report: Speculators sell dollars, buy crude ahead of Middle East escalation
13 June 2025: Commodities weekly Geopolitics lift crude and gold
12 June 2025: Brent crude briefly breaches 70 amid Iran attack threats
10 June 2025: COT Report: Metals, energy demand offset by broad Ag selling
6 June 2025: Commodities weekly Gold stalls spotlight shifts to cheaper silver and platinum
4 June 2025: Crude oil holds firm despite mounting supply glut fears
3 June 2025: Gold and silver break key levels as copper eyes tariff decision
2 June 2025: COT Report: Speculators sold crude ahead of OPEC hike
28 May 2025: Breakout or breakdown Gold silver and platinum face pivotal resistance zones
26 May 2025: COT Report: Hedge funds return to gold; elevated grains short
23 May 2025: Commodities weekly Diverging supply trends boost platinum weigh on crude
21 May 2025: Israel attack risks add modest risk premium to crude prices
20 May 2025: As gold pauses is platinum ready to shine for investors
19 May 2025: COT Report: Speculators show measured reaction to trade truce
16 May 2025: Commodities Weekly - Gold retreats Procyclicals rise amid trade truce optimism
14 May 2025: Crude stays range-bound despite latest tariff-truce bounce

13 May 2025: Gold holds steady as tariff truce sparks silver rebound
12 May 2025: COT Report: Broad risk reduction seen ahead of easing trade tensions
9 May 2025: Commodities weekly Sentiment improves as trade tensions cool before talks
8 May 2025: Copper market navigates tariff uncertainty amid tight global supply
7 May 2025: Agriculture markets diverge as trade war weather and speculators reshape landscape
6 May 2025: Crude climbs as market digests OPEC hike and shale slowdown risks

6 May 2025: Gold rises as Chinese demand rebounds post-holiday
5 May 2025: 
COT Report: Dollar-selling persists; Crude length trimmed ahead of OPEC output hike
1 May 2025: 
Gold corrects sharply from record highs as Chinese demand pauses

Podcasts that include commodities focus:


20 June 2025: Yep: NOK, wheat and Tesla in the same podcast.
13 June 2025: Geopolitics derails risk sentiment, but for how long?
6 June 2025: Silver rips as Musk-Trump bromance trips
28 May 2025: Nvidia to determine whether US stocks can achieve new highs
12 May 2025: As good as it gets on the trade news front
6 May 2025: 
Bears hang in at key levels as Palantir rides the retail whirlwind

More from the author             

Disclaimer

Confidentiality and Usage:
You may not reproduce, distribute, or transmit this material or any portion thereof without prior written permission from Saxo.

Nature of Information:
The information provided herein is based on current market conditions and analysts' opinions, which may reflect personal views of the author, and are subject to change without notice. This material does not include a record of any trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, or endorsement to enter into any transaction in any investment product. Any forecast on the economy, markets and economic trends of the markets provided is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of the investment product subject of this material.

Responsibility and Liability:
Saxo accepts no liability for any use that may be made of these comments or for any consequences that arise from such use. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

The information provided in this material is solely for information only. It is intended for general circulation and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. Accordingly, it should not be relied on or treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning specific situations of any person. Please seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs before you make a commitment to purchase an investment product. In the event that you choose not to seek advice from a financial adviser, you should consider whether any investment product mentioned in this publication is suitable for you.

Notwithstanding the above, insofar as any information provided herein contains research analyses or reports concerning any investment product authored by any foreign research house and is issued or promulgated to a person in Singapore who is not an accredited investor, expert investor, and/or institutional investor, Saxo Capital Market Pte. Ltd. accepts legal responsibility for the contents of this material to the extent required by law. Recipients of such material are to contact Saxo Capital Markets Pte. Ltd. in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.

Risk Disclosure:
Trading in investment products involve significant risk, including the risk of losing your entire investment. Historical returns are not a guarantee of future returns. Prices can both rise and fall, and there is a risk that you will not get back the money you invested.

Conflicts of interest:
The author may hold positions in the investment products mentioned. The author does not own positions in the underlying investment product exceeding 0.5% of its market capitalisation, save as otherwise declared. The author is not permitted to trade the mentioned investment products within the first 24 hours after the publication of this article.

Saxo maintains partnerships with companies that compensate Saxo for promotional activities conducted on its platform. Additionally, Saxo has agreements with certain partners who provide retrocession contingent upon clients purchasing specific investment products offered by these partners. While Saxo receives compensation from these partnerships, all content is conducted with the intention of providing clients with valuable options and information.

Publication details:
If any listed companies are the subject of the material, the content has not been submitted to the companies in question prior to publication.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Markets
88 Market Street
CapitaSpring #31-01
Singapore 048948

Contact Saxo

Singapore
Singapore

Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd ('Saxo Markets') is a company authorised and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) [Co. Reg. No.: 200601141M ] and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms & Risk Warning to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Saxo is part of the J. Safra Sarasin Group.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products such as Margin FX products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo Markets does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-sg/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website are not intended for residents of the United States, Malaysia and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.